Possible Questions on Frankenstein
Frankenstein is recognized to be one of the Gothic novel expressions and it is suited for a lot of characteristics found in a Romantic novel. All of the elements have to be considered that have a story that includes the settings, tone, narrative voice, character development, and others that contribute to the identity of the novel being a Gothic text. Then, the message of Shelley is offered, if you think it was her intention to convey one to readers. If you think that the novel is only for entertainment, prove your claim using evidence. However, there are several questions that need to be asked so that a deeper understanding of the novel is developed.
One question is how could the novel be recognized as a commentary about progress?
Frankenstein is a young scientist who is bursting with ambition becomes obsessed with the chance of creating life because it is something that science still has to accomplish. Frankenstein is able to do so and achieves what people normally would conceive as specific progress since he has added the coverage of what science lets humanity do. Although, this kind of progress leads to negative consequences and the monster embraces the life of Frankenstein, kills innocent people, and causes no good to society. A person might say that the novel shows a thesis that not all advancements in science are necessary.
Another question is: “What is the impact of showing a characters’ different points of view, especially the ones from Victor and the monster?
The narrative in Frankenstein changes from Robert Walton to Frankenstein, then to the monster and finally to Walton again. Every time the perspective changes, the reader gathers new information pertaining to the facts of the story and the narrator’s’ personality. Every narrator is able to provide more information that only comes from him. Walton elaborates the circumstances that happened during the last days of Victor. The creation of the monster is explained by Victor and the monster explains is a transition to evil. The variety in perspective between the narrators and the stark, especially because Victor and the monster are in opposition to the each other for the majority of the novel.
Do Victor and the monster have different opinions of women? How?
The women portrayed in Frankenstein are mostly pure, passive and innocent. However, there are some exceptions, like Caroline Beaufort, who is working to feed her impoverished father. In general, the women in the novel are demonstrated as kind but weak. For instance, Elizabeth defends Justine’s innocence but is powerless against her execution. Victor and the monster see women as the major companion that provides acceptance and comfort. Victor considers Elizabeth as someone who shows the sole joy that can get rid of the guilt he experienced. The monster looks for this kind of female to commiserate with the awful existence he has. Eventually, they destroy their love interest that shifts the woman’s status from being the object of desire to someone who becomes the revenge. This only shows that women do not the chance to act on as an individual.
Do you think the monster was given free will in the story?
Assuming that Frankenstein’s testimony is true, the monster is not given free will. Frankenstein states “the stages of the discovery were distinct and probable.” This implies that there is a scientific grounding in each aspect of the creation process. If this claim is to be taken seriously, then it can possibly infer that it was Frankenstein who designed the mechanisms of the brain and body of the monster. This is regardless if Frankenstein was not aware of the ramifications found in his design. Considering the creature in mind, most of the sentiments and schemas he had were taken from the three books he read. These books are The Sorrows of Werter, Paradise Lost, and Plutarch’s Lives. Therefore, there are possible grounds to claim that the external forces fully determine every aspect of the monster’s actions.
The novel’s alternate title is The Modern Prometheus, what is its relation to the story?
Frankenstein is known to be a Promethean analog just like when Prometheus stole fire that comes from the gods, and Frankenstein also stole from nature’s domain by learning to create life. This is the same when the gods punished Prometheus for the crime, and Frankenstein went through misery because of this creation, and then dies while trying to ruin what he made. This is why Shelley’s novel is a modern way of telling the story of Frankenstein.
Other possible questions:
What is the reason why Frankenstein is able to find purpose in life when he chooses to do revenge on the monster until either of them dies in mortal conflict?
Victor says that he broke his promise to Frankenstein to make a companion for him because he does not find him trustworthy. Is this true or not? Can Victor still be trusted even if he broke his promise?
Think about the questions in the essay and use it as a guide to creating your own paper.
Below you will find five outstanding thesis statements / paper topics for “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley that can be used as essay starters. All five incorporate at least one of the themes found in Frankenstein and are broad enough so that it will be easy to find textual support, yet narrow enough to provide a focused clear thesis statement. These thesis statements on Frankenstein offer a short summary of different elements that could be important in an essay but you are free to add your own analysis and understanding of the plot or themes to them. Using the essay topics below in conjunction with the list of important quotes from Frankenstein by mary Shelley, you should have no trouble connecting with the text and writing an excellent essay.Thesis Statement/Essay Topic #1: Frankenstein as a Gothic Novel & Example of Romanticism
Frankenstein is one of the finest expressions of the Gothic novel and also fits many of the characteristics of a Romantic novel. Consider all of the elements that comprise a story—including setting, character development, narrative voice, tone, to name just a few—and explain how each element contributes to the novel’s identity as a Gothic text or example of Romanticism. Then, offer your interpretation of Shelley’s message, if you believe she intended to convey one to her reader. If, alternately, you believe that the novel is purely for entertainment purposes, substantiate your claim with textual evidence. If you are stuck, please check out An Overview of Romanticism in Literature and Romanticism in FrankensteinThesis Statement / Essay Topic #2: Victor as God in “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley
Many students and critics have accused Victor of “playing God” by fabricating the Creature in his laboratory. Playing God, though, implies that a character is flawed by excessive hubris, which may or may not be applicable to Victor. Consider your own reaction to this charge, and write an essay in which you construct a solid argument that conveys your position to the reader. You will need to identify Victor’s character traits and explain how they do or do not substantiate the claim that Victor is trying to play God. You will also need to be sure to cite specific actions that Victor takes which provide evidence for your own claims. It might also be useful to consider the ways the presence of a “god” has an effect on the Creature in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.
Thesis Statement / Essay Topic #3: The Modern Prometheus: The Meaning of the Subtitle of “Frankenstein”
The subtitle of Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, is “The Modern Prometheus.” Prometheus was a figure from Greek mythology who stole fire from the gods and used it to create humans. Based on your knowledge of this myth, construct an essay in which you defend or refute the idea that Victor is the modern Prometheus. Incorporate specific, concrete evidence from the novel to support your arguments. Be sure to dig beneath the surface similarities between the myth and Shelley’s novel in order to identify latent symbols and their significance.
Thesis Statement / Essay Topic #4: The Narrative Structure in Frankenstein
Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, has three narrators who tell the story of the Creature’s creation and his subsequent actions. Write an expository essay in which you explain the function of the three distinct narrators and their respective stories. Identify how each of the narrators differs, what his motives might be, and what the implications are for the novel. You may wish to go beyond this suggestion to offer a well-considered opinion about who you believe to be the most reliable narrator, and why. Alternately, you may wish to argue how the novel would have been different if one or more of the narrators was not present in the text.
Thesis Statement / Essay Topic #4 The Character of the Creature
Considering the Creature’s version of events, conveyed to the reader through his narrative, decide whether you feel empathic towards the Creature’s plight, or whether you think he is an abomination. The essay you write will be persuasive in nature, as you want to convince your reader to adopt your point of view. You may wish to focus on one or more specific passages in order to build your argument. In any case, develop the essay fully by remarking upon the Creature’s significance and what he may represent with respect to society.
* Articles related to the topics here include Overview of Romanticism in LiteratureFrankenstein by Mary Shelley: Morality Without GodThe Presence of Romanticism in Frankenstein Comparison of Notions of Humanity in Frankenstein and Flowers for Algernon